As startups continue to mint new cryptocurrencies and tokens in initial coin offerings, they face a myriad of overlapping, and sometimes conflicting, regulations. That was a key takeaway from a panel discussion of blockchain experts that addressed the current state and likely future of global ICO regulations.
A Web of ICO Regulations
Martin Bartlam, partner and head of finance and projects for DLA Piper International, said each country is responsible for its own ICO regulations, which has resulted in wide differences. While some, such as China, have ICO markets, others, including Bermuda, have tried to ICO innovations. The impact is that some ICOs end up facing regulation from as many as 10 different jurisdictions, with some treating the coin as a token, others as a security and still others as a currency.
Don’t look to Congress for a road map. states and the SEC are likely to lead the way in clarifying ICO rules inside the U.S.
Amy Davine Kim, general counsel and global policy director for the , said that in the U.S. there are already a number of regulations relevant to ICOs. They include regulations related to securities but also anti-money laundering, tax and accounting laws. Financial crime and sanctions laws may also be applicable in cases where ICOs can be considered a form of money transfer, she said.
Bartlam and Kim agreed that one of the biggest challenges is when to apply which regulations. Both noted that a key issue for regulators in answering this question is determining when a coin should be considered a “utility token” versus a “security.” The former is not a financial investment like a security, but rather, acts as a sort of “,” providing future access to a company’s products or services.
The Path Ahead
Participants noted that while the U.S. federal government has been slow to act, states have begun to pass laws related to ICOs. Kim said that several states have passed legislation just to show “my state is open for business.”
Mark Radcliffe, partner at DLA Piper, said people tend to focus only on the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not pay enough attention to role of the states. The states, he said, have frequently been the “laboratories” for new regulations that “bubble up” to the federal level. He pointed to efforts by Wyoming, Puerto Rico and Arizona to innovate in the ICO space.