- Defense for former safemoon CEO John Karony challenged prosecutors’ evidence in court on May 20.
- Karony faces charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering related to the SafeMoon token.
- Prosecutors allege Karony misled investors about the safety and mechanics of SafeMoon and its liquidity pool.
- The defense argued that inconsistencies and lack of knowledge undermine claims of fraud and conspiracy.
- The jury is set to begin deliberations on the case on May 21.
Former SafeMoon CEO John Karony appeared in court on May 20 as his legal team summarized its defense against several federal charges. Karony is accused of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering in connection with events surrounding the cryptocurrency token SafeMoon.
Prosecutors claim that Karony misrepresented the way SafeMoon worked, especially the state of its liquidity pool—an account meant to guarantee token trading—and how revenue from trading platforms like BitMart was handled.
Attorney Nicholas Smith defended Karony by pointing out what he called ambiguities and contradictions in the prosecution’s case. Smith stated that some misleading information had been created before Karony became CEO and argued that Karony’s actions did not always show fraudulent intent due to his limited understanding of cryptocurrency at the time. "Fraud isn’t just about intent, it’s about a level of knowledge," Smith said.
Smith argued that posts about the “locking” of SafeMoon tokens were meant to inform investors that not all liquidity was locked. Prosecutors, however, argued that these posts were distractions to shift attention away from negative developments. These communications included links to blockchain transaction records, which Smith said allowed investors to verify the status of the liquidity pool themselves.
The defense also pointed to disagreements among SafeMoon executives, suggesting that such conflicts showed there was no real conspiracy. According to Smith, "Conspiracy requires agreement," and he stressed that the relationship between Karony and former CTO Thomas Smith was one of leader and subordinate, not co-conspirators.
Smith also claimed that statements calling SafeMoon “safe” do not meet the legal threshold for fraud because they lack specific factual detail. He compared this to “puffery,” a legal term for exaggerations common in product promotions, which do not always count as fraud in court.
The jury is expected to begin deliberations on the case on May 21. For more details and related updates, follow X, Google News, or visit the Protos YouTube channel.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- Crypto Founder Abducted in Uganda, Forced to Transfer $500K
- Questions Arise Over ADA Fund Movements — Hoskinson Denies Misuse
- Bold, My Aion Launch $2.5B AI Smart City Project in Abu Dhabi
- Apex Group to Acquire Full Stake in Fund Tokenization Firm Tokeny
- Bitcoin Soars Near $110K as Traders Bet on $300K by June
