- Since the start of the Iran conflict in mid-February, crude oil prices have surged approximately 36% while Bitcoin (BTC) has gained only about 3%.
- Oil traders quickly priced in an imminent war and supply disruption, with prices gapping up 11.5% when formal hostilities were announced, while BTC showed minimal immediate reaction.
- During the conflict’s most volatile period, oil prices spiked 91.5% to nearly $120 per barrel before pulling back, whereas BTC’s trading range remained far more conservative.
As U.S. military forces moved toward Iran in mid-February, sophisticated commodity markets began pricing in a major conflict while Bitcoin initially held steady. Reports from open-source intelligence accounts documented historic U.S. Air Force deployments, causing oil to rally 7% in 48 hours while BTC barely budged.
Consequently, oil established itself as the primary asset reacting to geopolitical supply risks. When Operation Epic Fury was formally announced, BTC briefly panicked, dropping 3.8% within 30 minutes. Oil, however, surged decisively when markets reopened.
The war’s escalation sharply impacted global energy flows, sending oil prices skyrocketing. Data shows crude gapped up 11.5% and later peaked with a 91.5% total gain as Gulf production fell dramatically.
Meanwhile, BTC absorbed headline volatility but largely shrugged off the conflict’s direct economic impacts. Its peak gain was a modest 9.2%, and it quickly recovered its mild pre-war losses.
However, comments from Donald Trump suggesting a swift resolution contributed to oil pulling back 29% from its peak. BTC held near its starting price throughout the three-week period.
Ultimately, one asset reacted to a global supply shock while the other served as a relatively stable hold. Traders seeking leveraged exposure to war headlines found it in oil markets, not in the trillion-dollar crypto asset.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
