Is the SEC Violating the First Amendment Rights of ICO Operators?

- Advertisement -

Is the SEC Violating the First Amendment Rights of ICO Operators?

Is the SEC’s gag order tactic in enforcement action settlements a breach of the First Amendment? The regulator’s “neither admit nor deny” policy for defendants who choose to settle when charged with violations is about to be tested.

Also read: Ahead of Ethereum Constantinople Update, Community Eyes ProgPoW

Subscribe to the  YouTube channel for great videos featuring industry insiders & experts

Cato Institute and Institute For Justice Team up to Find Out

The Washington, D.C.-based Cato Institute has teamed up with the Institute for Justice to file a lawsuit against the SEC to have the courts decide if their accusations that the regulator engages in “wildly inappropriate use of government power… directly contrary to the spirit of accountability and transparency that permeates our founding documents” are correct.

Almost all defendants against SEC enforcement actions–as well as those facing notices from the CFTC and the CFPB–plead guilty or settle the case for a financial penalty. In those cases, the agreement includes the provision forbidding the defendant from:

“…mak[ing] any public statement denying, directly or indirectly, any allegation in the [SEC’s] complaint or creating the impression that the complaint is without factual basis.”

The Facts Never Come to Light, Man

The Cato Institute lodged proceedings against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 9th alleging the watchdog’s “perpetual, lifetime gag orders” violate the First Amendment rights of settling defendants in civil enforcement actions. Per the filing:

“The government uses its extraordinary leverage in civil litigation to extract from settling defendants a promise to never tell their side of the story, no matter how outrageous the government’s conduct may have been and no matter how strong the public’s interest may be in knowing how the government conducts itself in high-stakes civil litigation.”

- Advertisement -

If facts are rarely presented to a court or publicized in SEC enforcement actions, the public never learn the merits of the SEC’s case or the position of the defendant.

First Amendment

If Uncertainty Is the Enemy of ICOs, the Cato Institute May Have a Fix

Given the number of actions the SEC has quietly taken against ICO operators over the past two years, it is in the public’s interest to know what violations the ICOs were accused of committing. Hester Peirce, often a dissenting voter at the SEC in ETF hearings, appears to agree with the sentiment that settlement procedures should not form part of a regulatory strategy. The commissioner said in May last year:

“Quite simply, a settlement negotiated by someone to end an investigation that is disrupting or destroying her life should not form the basis on which the law applicable to others is based.”

- Advertisement -

It also interests potential ICOs, as knowing how to be compliant with regulators is very much the domain of educated guesswork and luck. This is despite the regulator’s promise of plain English guidance for ICOs. The lack of transparency surrounding the industry in the U.S. has likely dissuaded many startups from setting up camp in the country.

If the Cato Institute can force a ruling on the perpetual gag order in its favor, at the very least it will bring clarity to the legality or otherwise of certain behavior among ICO operators.

Have your say. Are there Constitutional and First Amendment issues in the way the SEC handles ICOs? Could the Cato Institute decision be a bellwether event for ICOs in the United States?


Images via Pixabay

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest

Congress Debates Stablecoin Bill Amid Rising Bank and Crypto Tensions

U.S. lawmakers are moving forward with the Senate Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, with debates set to resume after...

American Engineer Drugged, Robbed in Sophisticated London Crypto Heist

An American software engineer lost approximately $123,000 in cryptocurrency after being drugged and robbed in London.The victim was targeted by an impersonator posing as...

Max Keiser Doubts New Bitcoin Treasuries’ Discipline in Bear Market

Bitcoin-focused companies are increasingly copying the treasury strategy used by Michael Saylor's Strategy.Max Keiser raised doubts about whether these newer companies can maintain commitment...

South Korea Election Puts Crypto Policy at Center of Debate

Nearly one-third of South Koreans hold digital assets, making crypto a vital issue in the upcoming presidential election.Both major parties support crypto exchange-traded funds...

Scottsdale Residents Lose $6M to Crypto Scams; Police Respond

Scottsdale residents have reported losing over $6 million to cryptocurrency Scams in 2024.Authorities say actual losses could be higher, as not all cases are...

Must Read

Tutorial: How to Buy a Domain Name Permanently? (Super Easy)

Are you ready to establish a permanent online presence and you want to buy a domain forever?In this tutorial, we'll show you how to...