- Elon Musk and Tesla have successfully won the dismissal of a federal lawsuit related to Dogecoin.
- The lawsuit accused Musk of manipulating Dogecoin’s price through social media endorsements.
- Investors claimed billions in losses and sought $258 billion in damages.
- U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled the claims as “aspirational and puffery.”
- The plaintiffs’ attorney plans to appeal the decision.
In a significant ruling, Elon Musk and Tesla have successfully won the dismissal of a federal lawsuit that accused them of manipulating the price of the cryptocurrency Dogecoin.
The case, which was initially filed in 2022, alleged that Musk’s social media endorsements and public appearances, particularly during a 2021 Saturday Night Live episode, had artificially inflated Dogecoin’s price by over 36,000% before it subsequently crashed.
Investors claimed they lost billions as a result of Musk’s actions, which they argued constituted a “pump and dump” scheme and insider trading, seeking $258 billion in damages.
The Allegations
The lawsuit against Musk and Tesla primarily centered on allegations of fraudulent promotion, insider trading, and a pump and dump scheme.
Investors specifically accused Musk of using his influential social media presence, notably on Twitter (now called X), to promote Dogecoin dishonestly.
They pointed to Musk’s comments, such as calling Dogecoin “the people’s crypto” and suggesting it could become a major currency, as misleading endorsements that inflated the price of the cryptocurrency by over 36,000%.
The plaintiffs also alleged that Musk and Tesla profited from Dogecoin trades strategically timed to coincide with Musk’s public statements.
They claimed that Musk controlled multiple Dogecoin wallets and used this influence to trade at the expense of investors, leading to significant financial losses when the price eventually crashed.
The lawsuit characterized Musk’s actions as a classic “pump and dump” scheme, where he allegedly inflated Dogecoin’s value through his endorsements and then allowed it to plummet, causing billions of dollars in losses for investors.
Legal Arguments and Ruling
Musk’s legal team argued that his tweets were merely “innocuous and often silly” and did not constitute actionable fraud or market manipulation.
They maintained that there was no concrete evidence to support claims that Musk owned the wallets involved in suspicious trading or that he sold Dogecoin for profit. Despite multiple attempts to amend their lawsuit, the plaintiffs failed to establish a valid case, according to Musk’s legal team.
On August 29, 2024, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that the claims against Musk were “aspirational and puffery,” declaring that no reasonable investor could rely on Musk’s statements as factual.
The judge found the allegations of market manipulation and insider trading to be too vague to pursue, leading to the dismissal of the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled.
Reaction and Future Appeal
Musk’s legal team expressed satisfaction with the ruling, emphasizing that the lawsuit lacked merit and was a baseless attempt to hold Musk accountable for investors’ speculative losses.
Alex Spiro, Musk’s attorney, stated, “We are pleased with the court’s decision, which reaffirms that Mr. Musk’s public statements were not deceitful or manipulative.”
Meanwhile, the plaintiffs’ attorney indicated plans to appeal the decision, arguing that Musk’s statements had significant consequences for investors.
Broader Implications for Cryptocurrency Regulation
This ruling has broader implications for the regulation of cryptocurrencies and the conduct of influential individuals in the market. The case highlights the challenges of proving market manipulation and the high burden of evidence required to hold individuals accountable for their public statements and actions in the cryptocurrency space.
Cryptocurrency investors and enthusiasts often rely on endorsements and statements from high-profile figures, which can significantly impact the market.
However, this case underscores the need for investors to exercise caution and make informed decisions based on a wide range of information rather than relying solely on the statements of influential individuals.
The dismissal of the lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla marks a significant legal victory for the billionaire entrepreneur.
Previous Articles:
- MakerDAO’s Rebranding to Sky Introduces New Stablecoin and Governance Token
- Trump Launches ‘The DeFiant Ones’ Cryptocurrency Platform for Financial Inclusion
- Sony Unveils Ethereum Layer-2 Blockchain Soneium, Expands Web3 Footprint
- REPORT: Cryptocurrency Corporations Spend Big to Influence 2024 Elections
- Ferrari Expands Cryptocurrency Payments to European Dealers
