BTC $71,807
2026 Bull Run Is Building Start trading with 5% OFF all fees
Sign Up Now
BTC $71,807
Bull Run 2026 | 5% Off Fees Open your Binance account today
Sign Up

BCBS: Non-Maturity Deposit Drivers Remain Traditional

Traditional deposit risks, not technology, drove 2023 bank runs, according to major international review.

  • A major Bank for International Settlements review finds traditional factors like deposit insurance and bank solvency still dominate deposit stability, not just withdrawal speed.
  • The 2023 bank runs were characterized by extreme concentrations of uninsured deposits, often over 90%, from specific business sectors.
  • Technology amplified the crises through faster information spread and depositor coordination rather than the mechanics of fund movement.
  • While instructive, the analysis does not address the future impact of stablecoins or tokenized money market funds on bank deposits.

A new Basel Committee working paper provides a crucial reassessment of what drives bank deposit stability following the 2023 turmoil. The international review concludes traditional risk factors, not new technology, remain the primary drivers of depositor behavior. However, it acknowledges that digital tools accelerated the runs by enabling faster information and coordination.

- Advertisement -

Consequently, the failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank shared four notable characteristics. These included extreme concentrations of uninsured deposits, with SVB at 94% and Signature at 90%, alongside sector concentration and large unrealized losses. Meanwhile, Silvergate Bank is often incorrectly grouped with these regulatory seizures.

The paper clarifies Silvergate undertook a voluntary wind down after the collapse of FTX. This critical distinction matters for drawing accurate lessons from the period. The authors note large corporations have moved funds electronically at speed since the late 1970s.

Therefore, the argument about withdrawal speed is less compelling than it initially appears. For digital asset firms and their banks, the findings are instructive on historical dynamics. Yet the paper’s scope does not cover stablecoins or tokenized money market funds. Consequently, their longer-term impact on traditional deposits remains an open question for future analysis.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

- Advertisement -

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -
Ad
Altseason Is Loading. Don't watch from the sidelines.
SOL $90.51
DOGE $0.0963
LINK $9.02
SUI $1.00
5% off fees when you sign up
Start Trading
Ad
Pay Less on Every Trade. For Life.
$10K/mo volume Save $60/yr
$50K/mo volume Save $300/yr
$100K/mo volume Save $600/yr
5% off all trading fees when you sign up
Claim Your Discount

Latest News

Australia payment rails may adapt for tokenized money

Australian regulators see tokenized money like stablecoins and deposit tokens as a design factor...

Linux “Copy Fail” Bug Lets Local Users Gain Root

A critical Linux flaw allows an unprivileged local user to write to a file's...

Strong Meta Q1 2026 Earnings Beat Can’t Prevent Stock Plunge

Meta's strong Q1 2026 earnings were overshadowed by a higher 2026 capex forecast, causing...

Trump-Linked WLFI Token Plunges 14% Amid Lockup Vote

The World Liberty Financial (WLFI) token dropped nearly 14% Wednesday amid a controversial governance...

Microsoft, Alphabet Surge on AI as OpenAI Stumbles

Google Cloud revenue surged 63% year-over-year to $20.03 billion in Q1 2026, with enterprise...

Must Read

What Is a Sim Swap Hack?

You've likely heard the term 'sim-swap,' but do you really know what it means? It's a type of fraud that's rapidly increasing, where scammers...
Ad
Altseason Is Loading. These 4 coins are trending right now.
SOL $92.12
DOGE $0.0950
LINK $9.02
SUI $1.02
5% off spot fees when you sign up
Start Trading