BTC $71,807
2026 Bull Run Is Building Start trading with 5% OFF all fees
Sign Up Now
BTC $71,807
Bull Run 2026 | 5% Off Fees Open your Binance account today
Sign Up

BCBS: Non-Maturity Deposit Drivers Remain Traditional

Traditional deposit risks, not technology, drove 2023 bank runs, according to major international review.

  • A major Bank for International Settlements review finds traditional factors like deposit insurance and bank solvency still dominate deposit stability, not just withdrawal speed.
  • The 2023 bank runs were characterized by extreme concentrations of uninsured deposits, often over 90%, from specific business sectors.
  • Technology amplified the crises through faster information spread and depositor coordination rather than the mechanics of fund movement.
  • While instructive, the analysis does not address the future impact of stablecoins or tokenized money market funds on bank deposits.

A new Basel Committee working paper provides a crucial reassessment of what drives bank deposit stability following the 2023 turmoil. The international review concludes traditional risk factors, not new technology, remain the primary drivers of depositor behavior. However, it acknowledges that digital tools accelerated the runs by enabling faster information and coordination.

- Advertisement -

Consequently, the failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank shared four notable characteristics. These included extreme concentrations of uninsured deposits, with SVB at 94% and Signature at 90%, alongside sector concentration and large unrealized losses. Meanwhile, Silvergate Bank is often incorrectly grouped with these regulatory seizures.

The paper clarifies Silvergate undertook a voluntary wind down after the collapse of FTX. This critical distinction matters for drawing accurate lessons from the period. The authors note large corporations have moved funds electronically at speed since the late 1970s.

Therefore, the argument about withdrawal speed is less compelling than it initially appears. For digital asset firms and their banks, the findings are instructive on historical dynamics. Yet the paper’s scope does not cover stablecoins or tokenized money market funds. Consequently, their longer-term impact on traditional deposits remains an open question for future analysis.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

- Advertisement -

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -
Ad
Altseason Is Loading. Don't watch from the sidelines.
SOL $90.51
DOGE $0.0963
LINK $9.02
SUI $1.00
5% off fees when you sign up
Start Trading
Ad
Pay Less on Every Trade. For Life.
$10K/mo volume Save $60/yr
$50K/mo volume Save $300/yr
$100K/mo volume Save $600/yr
5% off all trading fees when you sign up
Claim Your Discount

Latest News

Dogecoin spikes to $0.1059 on X trading news, then fades; death cross remains

Here is the HTML code for the cryptocurrency news article, formatted as requested....

PayPal Joins Meta’s Muse AI Commerce Ecosystem

Paypal partnered with Meta to bring PayPal checkout to the Muse AI agent, enabling...

US Probes Binance Over Iran Sanctions Violations

The Manhattan US attorney's office and the Justice Department are investigating Binance over potential...

EU central banks drop stablecoin deposit rule for liquidity

The European System of Central Banks (ESCB) proposes replacing mandatory bank-deposit thresholds for stablecoin...

Critical VeloCloud Orchestrator flaw actively exploited

Arista disclosed a critical flaw (CVE-2026-93952) in on-premises VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) actively exploited as...

Must Read

17 Best Audiobooks On Blockchain Technology For Beginners

If you're looking to dive into the world of blockchain technology, you're in for a treat. The field is rapidly evolving and the potential...
Ad
Altseason Is Loading. These 4 coins are trending right now.
SOL $92.12
DOGE $0.0950
LINK $9.02
SUI $1.02
5% off spot fees when you sign up
Start Trading