- The UK government seeks to retain most of 61,000 Bitcoin seized in 2018, pending court decisions.
- There is debate within the UK crypto sector on whether holding the Bitcoin benefits the industry or contradicts existing laws.
- Current UK policy and law focus on asset recovery for victims, not long-term government investment in cryptocurrency.
- Industry groups suggest a Bitcoin reserve could strengthen the UK’s crypto position, while others note policy and legal obstacles.
- Experts propose studies and phased asset sales, referencing past financial moves like the early 2000s Gold sale.
The UK government is in the process of deciding what to do with approximately 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $7 billion, which it seized in 2018. The decision is part of ongoing court proceedings to determine how much of these assets should be returned to victims of a major Chinese investment scam.
Officials have stated that confiscated Bitcoin is handled under the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA), with the main goal of recovering criminal proceeds rather than holding digital currencies as a strategic reserve. Some in the industry, including representatives from CryptoUK, believe selling the Bitcoin right away could be at odds with the government’s efforts to support the crypto sector.
Professor Naseem Naqvi, President of the British Blockchain Association, said UK guidelines make it clear that asset recovery is intended to help victims and not for government speculation or reserves. He explained that keeping seized Bitcoin would involve risks due to price volatility and would blur the difference between recovering crime proceeds and government investments. “Recent ministerial answers have reaffirmed that seized assets are managed and realised under POCA, and that the UK’s official reserves policy does not contemplate adding Bitcoin; there are no plans to change this or to consider BTC as a reserve asset,” he said.
A spokesperson for CryptoUK, whose membership includes companies such as Gemini and OKX, argued against the immediate sale of the government-held Bitcoin. “We would urge the government to take a long-term view on the holding of crypto and deeply consider what message offloading these digital assets would send to the UK’s crypto industry,” the spokesperson said.
Some experts drew comparisons to the controversial sale of more than half of the UK’s gold reserves between 1999 and 2002, which brought in $3.5 billion at then-low market prices. Since then, gold prices have increased significantly. Despite these debates, Naqvi suggested that, if ordered by the courts, the government could sell the Bitcoin in phases—such as through scheduled auctions—to reduce the impact on markets, in line with global practices while adhering to POCA.
The British Blockchain Association recommends studying the possibility of cryptocurrency reserves in the future, with small-scale research or pilot projects ranging from 0.1% to 0.5% of UK assets. However, they do not support holding confiscated Bitcoin as an official reserve asset at this time.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- CometJacking Attack Exploits AI Browser to Steal Sensitive Data
- Wells Fargo: US Dollar’s Reserve Status Safe Despite BRICS Push
- Stablecoin Market Hits $300B, Signals Potential Crypto Rally
- Jamie Dimon Warns US Dollar Reserve Status at Risk Over Mismanagement
- Bitcoin Hits $124K High as Trump Floats $2,000 Tariff Dividend
