- Robinhood introduced tokenized stocks tied to OpenAI and SpaceX for its European users.
- OpenAI stated it was not involved in or did not approve these digital tokens and denied that they represent actual company equity.
- Elon Musk criticized the move, calling OpenAI’s equity “fake.”
- The tokenized stocks use blockchain technology on the Ethereum layer-2 network, Arbitrum, giving investors indirect exposure to private companies.
- Legal and technical experts raised concerns about transparency, regulatory issues, and limited usability outside Robinhood‘s closed platform.
Robinhood announced the launch of tokenized stock giveaways representing OpenAI and SpaceX, offering digital tokens linked to these companies’ valuations for eligible users in Europe this week. The tokens provide indirect access to private market investments by tracking the price of the companies’ equity, but do not grant legal ownership or voting rights.
OpenAI quickly responded that it had no partnership with Robinhood and had not approved any transfer of shares. In a post on X, OpenAI said the tokens are not real equity in the company. “We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer.”
Following OpenAI’s statement, Elon Musk responded on X, calling OpenAI’s equity “fake.” Robinhood stated that these tokenized stocks are recorded on Arbitrum, an Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, and are structured to give retail investors indirect exposure to private firms via ownership stakes in a special purpose vehicle.
According to Robinhood, the tokens allow holders to benefit if the value of the related private company rises, but do not confer share ownership, voting rights, or the ability to transfer tokens to external wallets. The tokens are priced in U.S. dollars, but U.S. customers cannot buy them due to regulatory rules. More information is available in Robinhood’s official FAQ.
Some investors argued that the tokens still expose holders to shifts in company value, while legal experts warned that the structure may not meet transparency and regulatory standards. Kurt Watkins of Watkins Legal told Decrypt that the tokens might not actually track OpenAI’s value and could mislead investors, citing the absence of true underlying rights.
The contracts for these tokens verify customer identity against an approved registry, making them incompatible with most decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. Critics like Ren from Electric Capital called the setup a “walled garden,” suggesting that centralized control may limit innovation and wider adoption in crypto markets.
Tokenization refers to converting real-world assets like stocks into digital tokens on blockchain platforms, which can make trading simpler. However, because OpenAI is not publicly traded, there are added complexities and legal questions around these products. Both Robinhood and OpenAI declined further comment to Decrypt.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- Ripple Applies for US Banking License, Seeks Fed Master Account
- Radix Launches Early Test for 1 Billion XRD DeFi Rewards Campaign
- Investors Pump $380M into Four Surging DeFi Protocols in June
- FHFA Chief Demands Probe Into Powell Over $2.5B Fed HQ Revamp
- SEC to Review Grayscale GDLC ETF Approval, Stays Conversion Order
