[A social media war erupted after a ChainLink figure called XRPL an “obsolete ghost chain,” drawing immediate retaliation from the XRP community.][The core dispute centers on how each project’s founding entity handles its assets, with Chainlink buying its own token and Ripple buying back its corporate equity.][Despite their different functions, the feud between the fanbases—LINK Marines and XRP Army—has persisted for years, fueled by competitive valuation comparisons and alleged social media misinformation.]
On March 16, 2026, a controversy ignited after Chainlink community liaison Zach Rynes sparked a social media war by calling the XRP Ledger (XRPL) an “obsolete ghost chain” and criticizing its foundational “bridge currency” thesis. Consequently, key figures from the XRP community, including attorney Bill Morgan and Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz, quickly fired back with strong rebuttals.
Rynes, who stated the rivalry dates to at least 2019 according to a podcast last August, highlighted XRPL’s minimal real-world asset market share and stablecoin adoption. However, he framed a more fundamental conflict around each entity’s financial strategy, noting Chainlink converts institutional fees into token buybacks while Ripple converts XRP sales into corporate equity.
Meanwhile, the underlying debate pits fans of Chainlink’s oracle services against proponents of XRPL’s payment rails, often escalating into a divisive identity war. The irony, as observers note, is that Chainlink provides data feeds, while XRPL is a payment network, and Ripple’s own stablecoin RLUSD already uses Chainlink’s price feeds.
Valuations, however, make the tribalism appear stark, with XRP holding a $91 billion market cap compared to LINK’s $7 billion. The feud was further fueled when Rynes flagged an XRP influencer for plagiarizing a LINK Marines infographic, which one XRP supporter summarized as proof “The Chainlink folks are upset with XRP.”
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
