Institutions May “Fire” Slow Bitcoin Devs Over Quantum: Carter

VC warns Bitcoin's big investors may replace developers ignoring quantum computing risk, sparking takeover fears.

  • Venture capitalist Nic Carter warns Bitcoin‘s major institutional holders may push to replace developers if quantum computing risks aren’t addressed.
  • BlackRock currently holds roughly 3.62% of all Bitcoin, an asset valued at approximately $50.15 billion as of publication.
  • The crypto industry is divided on the urgency, with some calling it an “existential threat” while others believe the risk is decades away.
  • Carter argues this inertia could lead to a successful “corporate takeover” of Bitcoin’s development direction.

During a podcast episode published on Thursday, venture capitalist Nic Carter posited that the patience of major Bitcoin-holding institutions may soon run out. Carter said these financial giants could fire current developers for not addressing quantum computing threats quickly enough.

- Advertisement -

“I think the devs will continue to do nothing,” Carter stated on the Bits and Bips podcast. He specifically highlighted BlackRock, which holds assets worth billions of dollars in Bitcoin for its clients.

Consequently, Carter warned that this developer inaction might lead to what he called a successful “corporate takeover.” Zero Knowledge Consulting founder Austin Campbell echoed a similar sentiment about institutional investors eventually feeling compelled to speak up.

However, the broader industry remains split on the immediacy of the quantum risk. Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards views it as a potential “existential threat” requiring an urgent security upgrade.

Meanwhile, other prominent figures believe the threat is significantly overblown. This debate unfolds as Bitcoin’s price trades around $70,281, having declined over 26% in the past month, according to CoinMarketCap.

- Advertisement -

In contrast, Lumida Wealth Management founder Ram Ahluwahlia argued that major institutions in Bitcoin are typically passive, not activist, investors. This suggests a potential conflict between those fearing institutional overreach and those expecting continued institutional restraint.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Roundhill Files for 2028 Presidential Election ETFs

Roundhill Investments has filed to launch six ETFs tied to the 2028 U.S. election...

Tokenized bonds for welfare need compliance fix: exec

Blockchain technology can effectively administer government social benefit programs by speeding up digital delivery...

Bitcoin Bear Market Bottom Seen at $55,000: Report

CryptoQuant analysts report Bitcoin's "ultimate bear market bottom" price is approximately $55,000.The firm's market...

Figure Tech Breached via Employee Social Engineering

Fintech lender Figure Technology was breached via a social-engineering attack on an employee.The Hacking...

BRICS Launches “The Unit” to De-Dollarize Global Finance

The BRICS bloc, representing nearly half the global population and 40% of world GDP,...

Must Read

Top 10 BEST Crypto Trading Books for New Traders

If you're thinking of diving into the crypto trading space, acquiring solid knowledge isn't just recommended - it's essential to protect your investment.Learning...
🔥 #AD Get 20% OFF any new 12 month hosting plan from Hostinger. Click here!