- Citadel Securities called for tighter regulation of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols handling tokenized securities.
- The DeFi industry rejected these claims, saying existing frameworks can support investor protections without traditional registration.
- SEC leadership under the current administration appears open to protecting DeFi developers and innovation.
- DeFi Education Fund and others accused Citadel Securities of mischaracterizing the technology and protecting its market interests.
Citadel Securities submitted a 13-page letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) urging stricter oversight of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols that manage tokenized securities. This prompted a written response on Friday from a coalition including the DeFi Education Fund, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), the DigitalChamber, and others. They called Citadel’s assertions “baseless” and defended the viability of onchain markets to achieve investor protections without mandating traditional SEC intermediary registration, as mentioned here.
According to the coalition’s letter, they share Citadel’s goals of protecting investors and maintaining orderly markets. However, they argue that these goals can be met within decentralized systems rather than through registration as exchanges or brokerages. Citadel Securities had claimed that such DeFi protocols function similarly to regulated entities and thus require full regulatory compliance.
The SEC is currently led by new management seeking ways to grant the crypto industry more flexible policy options. Support from White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt for shielding software developers and DeFi was highlighted on his social media presence, underscoring some government openness to innovation while maintaining protections, as seen on X.
A Citadel Securities spokesperson affirmed support for tokenization and digital finance innovation but insisted these advances must not erode investor safeguards that uphold U.S. equity markets as a global standard.
Responding to Citadel’s letter, the DeFi coalition pointed out “several factual mischaracterizations and misleading statements.” Jennifer Rosenthal, spokesperson for the DeFi Education Fund, suggested Citadel was motivated by protection of its own business interests and market share. She stated, “It is convenient for Citadel to question the existence of a technology that threatens its business and significant market share.”
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- Tether Proposes $2.15B Bid to Acquire Juventus Football Club
- Strategy’s BTC Yield Turns Negative Amid Investor Confidence Drop
- Phantom Wallet Integrates Kalshi Markets for 20M Users
- GitHub Hosts New PyStoreRAT Malware Targeting Developers
- Vanguard Calls Bitcoin a “Speculative Digital Toy,” Warns Investors
