Bitcoin Dev Proposes Hard Fork to Combat Quantum Computer Threats

Bitcoin Developer Proposes Hard Fork to Protect Against Quantum Attacks, Potentially Altering Bitcoin's Supply

  • Bitcoin developer Agustin Cruz has proposed a hard fork called “Quantum-Resistant Address Migration Protocol” to protect against future quantum computer attacks.
  • The proposal would force users to move their bitcoin to quantum-resistant wallets by a deadline or risk losing access to their funds.
  • This controversial plan could potentially alter Bitcoin’s total supply by effectively burning coins not transferred by the deadline.

Bitcoin developers are preparing for potential quantum computer attacks through a proposed hard fork that could permanently alter the cryptocurrency’s supply. Developer Agustin Cruz recently submitted a draft Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) called “Quantum-Resistant Address Migration Protocol” (QRAMP) to the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list, outlining code for destroying unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs) that remain vulnerable to quantum computing.

- Advertisement -

The proposal addresses a fundamental security vulnerability in Bitcoin’s current system. Bitcoin uses Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) to secure UTXOs, but this technology cannot withstand attacks from sufficiently advanced quantum computers. While no quantum computer has yet successfully stolen bitcoins, experts believe more advanced machines could potentially do so within the next few years.

Mandatory Migration with Serious Consequences

If QRAMP were to gain consensus and be implemented in Bitcoin Core, users would face a countdown to transfer their funds to quantum-resistant wallets. After this deadline, any transactions from legacy wallets would be rejected by the network. In the notes of his BIP, Cruz describes the proposal as providing “rightful owners with a clear, non-negotiable opportunity to secure their funds,” calling it “realistic” and “necessary.”

This approach would effectively change Bitcoin’s supply by permanently burning coins that aren’t transferred by the deadline. The controversial nature of QRAMP stems from concerns about users who might be unable to access their wallets for extended periods due to various life circumstances.

Debate Over Implementation Continues

As a draft proposal, QRAMP has not yet received a BIP number assignment. The Bitcoin community remains divided on how best to implement quantum resistance into the network. Many developers acknowledge the eventual need for quantum protection but disagree on implementation methods.

- Advertisement -

Cruz’s proposal represents one of several approaches being considered to address the looming quantum computing threat to Bitcoin’s security. The community must reach consensus on a solution before quantum computers advance to the point where they can break ECDSA encryption.

For the latest developments in this ongoing discussion, Bitcoin users can follow updates on the draft BIP and the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Coinbase Base App Rebrand Sparks Zora Token and SocialFi Surge

Coinbase rebranded its Wallet to the Base App on July 16, sparking a surge...

Solana Holds $177 Support as ETF Delays Weigh, Eyes $205 Rebound

Solana (SOL) saw its price fall by 3.2% this week after a strong rise...

Astronomer Turns Viral CEO Kiss Cam Scandal Into Data-Driven Win

Astronomer, a data infrastructure company, faced a viral public incident involving its CEO and...

Japan’s Crypto Bottleneck: Regulation, Not Taxes, Drives Talent Out

Regulatory approval delays are causing crypto startups to leave Japan.A proposed 20% flat tax...

Solana Rallies 5%, Eyes $200 as Bulls Challenge $188 Resistance

Solana (SOL) has recovered, rising over 5% in 24 hours and 30% in the...

Must Read

13 Best Bitcoin Casinos & Crypto Casinos

Online betting has always been a popular and easy option to play from the comfort of your home or on the go, and with...