- Regulatory regimes for stablecoins now exist across major jurisdictions, with clear AML/CFT and sanctions requirements.
- Elliptic sets out practical compliance steps for issuers and banks, including KYC, Travel Rule adherence, and transaction monitoring.
- Criminal use of stablecoins includes custom non-blacklistable tokens, sanctions-evasion services, and rapid swaps to avoid freezing.
- Blockchain analytics and issuer due diligence (IDD) are key tools for banks and issuers to detect illicit activity on-chain.
Elliptic published a report outlining compliance and risk-management steps for stablecoin issuers and the banks that serve them. The report says regulatory frameworks in the United States, European Union, Hong Kong and other jurisdictions now require specific operational standards, including AML/CFT measures and sanctions controls. It highlights why stablecoins matter: they enable near-instant, low-cost cross-border payments and are being integrated by major financial institutions and payment providers.
Regulators and private-sector guidance set expectations for issuers and banks. Issuers must perform KYC, vet virtual asset service provider counterparties, comply with the Travel Rule, and run ongoing transaction monitoring. Banks must evaluate an issuer’s licensing, the strength of its compliance controls, and any relationships with high-risk VASPs.
The report identifies stablecoin-specific criminal typologies. These include bespoke stablecoins designed to resist blacklisting, “sanctions evasion-as-a-service,” and routing proceeds through decentralized services to prevent freezing. It documents three case studies: industrial-scale cyber scams in Southeast Asia that use guarantee marketplaces and complicit OTC brokers; Ruble-backed stablecoins such as A7A5 created to circumvent sanctions, moving over $1 billion daily; and frequent hacks where attackers swap freezable tokens for unfreezable ones before issuers can act.
To manage these risks, established financial crime controls apply and blockchain monitoring provides necessary visibility. Issuers should monitor direct customer activity and wider token-ecosystem risks so they can flag sanctioned party involvement even when those parties are not direct customers. Banks can use blockchain analytics for Issuer Due Diligence (IDD) to verify on-chain behavior matches declared reserve use and risk profiles.
The report also offers jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction regulatory summaries, prioritized risk categories, recommendations for integrating blockchain monitoring, and a glossary for compliance teams new to stablecoin oversight.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- China Clears Alibaba, Tencent, ByteDance to Prep Nvidia H200
- Bitcoin 68% below parity with gold; fair price $278,000 est.
- Prediction Market Sees 30% Chance Bitcoin Dumps to $69K Now!
- TikTok Forms U.S. JV; ByteDance Keeps 19.9% Stake After EO25
- Crypto groups slam FTC over Nomad ‘kill switch’ demand now!!
