- Michael Saylor says the top threat to Bitcoin is developers pushing protocol changes.
- Saylor repeated the claim on social media and in past interviews, arguing upgrades can introduce security risks. (tweet)
- He previously urged developers to “defend the network” rather than change it. (Sept. tweet) (Sept. 16 interview)
- Supporters and critics disagree on whether protocol changes are the single greatest risk to Bitcoin; figures such as Jameson Lopp point to key custodial concentration instead. (Lopp)
- Debate references Bitcoin’s long history of developer-driven improvements, including human-readable seed phrases and multi-signature wallets, which developers implemented without destabilizing the network. (whitepaper) (genesis)
Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), said on social media on Jan. 24 that the biggest risk to Bitcoin comes from ambitious developers pushing protocol changes. He linked the threat to developers who pursue upgrades rather than focusing on network security. (tweet)
Saylor has made similar points before. In September he wrote, “Defend the network, don’t F with the network.” (tweet) He also said in a Sept. 16 interview, “The biggest danger is a very talented, well-funded, well-intentioned developer trying to do something good.” (video)
Reaction split across the crypto community. Figures including Samson Mow, Jesse Myers, Cøbra, and Alex Bergeron retweeted Saylor’s post, and more than 1,000 others amplified it via retweets. (retweets)
Critics dispute Saylor’s ranking of risks. Jameson Lopp said the main threat is centralization of key ownership into fewer hands, linking risk to custodial control rather than protocol changes. (tweet) Others pointed out past proposals Saylor supported, including a suggested change that would freeze some coins, and noted this when challenging his position. (reminder)
Supporters of Saylor’s caution point to the potential for bugs or unintended consequences from upgrades. Opponents note Bitcoin’s history of developer-driven improvements — for example, the move from raw private-key hex to human-readable seed phrases (a set of words that secure private keys), the creation of multiple keypairs from a single seed (hierarchical deterministic wallets), and privacy improvements for multi-signature wallets (wallets that require multiple keys to authorize a transaction). These developments built on decades of work described in the Bitcoin whitepaper. (whitepaper) (genesis)
The disagreement centers on whether developer-led protocol changes are the single greatest risk to Bitcoin, or one of several important risks facing the network. For more on Protos reporting, see Protos on X, Google News, and YouTube.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- MEXC and ether.fi launch Visa crypto card with 4% cashback!!
- Community Votes to End Radix Season 1 on Feb 1, 2026 7d vest
- MSTR Keeps Buying BTC as Price Lags, Shares Stay Under Press
- Russia Brands WhiteBIT ‘Undesirable’ in Crackdown on Aid Now
- Scrypto v1.3.1 Enables Modern Rust Toolchains (Up to 1.92.0)
