OpenAI Fights NYT Demand for 20M ChatGPT Chats, Cites Privacy

OpenAI Challenges Times’ Request for 20 Million Private ChatGPT Conversations

  • OpenAI rejects a demand to provide 20 million private ChatGPT user conversations in an ongoing lawsuit.
  • The company claims the request could expose sensitive user data and violate privacy protections.
  • The lawsuit centers on alleged copyright infringement of news articles for AI training.
  • OpenAI calls the requested data disclosure a risk to common security practices.

OpenAI is contesting a demand for 20 million private ChatGPT conversations as part of a copyright lawsuit filed in federal court in Manhattan. According to a recent blog post from OpenAI Chief Information Security Officer Dane Stuckey, the request came from the party that brought the lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft in December 2023. The suit alleges copyright infringement related to the use of millions of news articles for large language model training, such as ChatGPT and Bing Chat, without permission or compensation.

- Advertisement -

Stuckey stated the requested user data may include payment details and highly personal content. He described the demand as overly broad and not necessary for the current legal proceedings. “As part of their baseless lawsuit, they’ve demanded the court to force us to hand over 20 million user conversations,” Stuckey explained in the post.

The company emphasized that turning over private chats would threaten user privacy. The blog post stated: “This demand disregards long-standing privacy protections, breaks with common-sense security practices, and would force us to turn over tens of millions of highly personal conversations from people who have no connection to the Times’ baseless lawsuit against OpenAI.”

This is not the first time such a request has been made. OpenAI pointed out a previous push for access to 1.4 billion user conversations, which the company also resisted. As Stuckey stated, “They have tried this before. Originally, the Times wanted you to lose the ability to delete your private chats. We fought that and restored your right to remove them… We pushed back, and we’re pushing back again now.”

The legal dispute represents a significant clash over how Artificial Intelligence companies use online content to train their models, a key issue as generative AI continues to grow in influence.

- Advertisement -

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

SEC’s Paul Atkins, CFTC’s Michael Selig to Discuss US Crypto

SEC Chair Paul Atkins and CFTC Chair Michael Selig will hold an event on...

Tesla market share falls to 9.9% in California; Toyota grows

Tesla registrations in California fell to 179,656 in 2025, down from 202,865 the prior...

Capital One to Buy Brex for $5.15B Boosting Business Crypto.

Capital One agreed to buy San Francisco-based Brex in a $5.15 billion stock-and-cash deal.The...

Nasdaq Removes Options Limits on Spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs

Nasdaq removed 25,000-contract limits on options tied to spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs.The rule...

AMD rallies on AI one-click bundle, partnerships to $275 Jan

AMD stock has climbed recently and is being positioned to reach $275 by the...
- Advertisement -

Must Read

7 Best NFT Marketplaces for Every Need

Open Sea | Pianity | Foundation | Magic Eden | SuperRare | Rarible | Theta Drop | Other Platforms | About NFTs | FAQ...
🔥 #AD Get 20% OFF any new 12 month hosting plan from Hostinger. Click here!