Law Firm Partner Dodges Questions About Controversial Dogshit2 Token Launch

Law Firm Managing Partner Dodges Questions About Dogshit2 Memecoin Creation During Live Interview

  • Managing partner of Burwick Law deflects questions about Dogshit2 memecoin’s creation during livestreamed interview.
  • Law firm’s dossier against Pump Fun contains detailed evidence of the token’s creation process.
  • Official statement denies any affiliation or ownership interest in the controversial token.
  • Crypto influencer Wirelyss suggests potential semantic wordplay in the firm’s denial of “on-chain” launch.
  • Controversy highlights growing intersection of legal actions and memecoin developments in crypto space.

The managing partner of Burwick Law, Max Burwick, faced intense scrutiny during a Thursday interview regarding his firm’s potential involvement in launching the controversial Dogshit2 memecoin, which features prominently in their ongoing lawsuit against cryptocurrency platform Pump Fun.

- Advertisement -

During the livestreamed interview with legal intern Dancing Eddie, Burwick repeatedly sidestepped direct questions about the token’s creation, stating “I don’t understand the interest” and questioning why the launch matters.

The controversy stems from Burwick Law’s detailed dossier against Pump Fun, which contained step-by-step documentation of Dogshit2’s creation process. While the firm issued a statement categorically denying any “affiliation, endorsement, or ownership interest” in the token, crypto analyst Wirelyss has highlighted potential semantic nuances in their denial of “on-chain” launching.

The distinction between on-chain and off-chain token launches has become crucial in this case. In cryptocurrency terms, an on-chain launch refers to the actual deployment of smart contracts on the blockchain, while off-chain activities include the preliminary setup and configuration steps.

When pressed about who specifically “clicked deploy” on the token, Burwick deflected, suggesting that various parties might have different motivations for pursuing this information, from seeking “gotcha” moments to potential trading opportunities.

This incident reflects a growing trend of legal firms becoming increasingly involved in cryptocurrency-related litigation, while simultaneously navigating the complex technical and ethical considerations of blockchain technology. The case continues to draw attention from both legal and cryptocurrency communities, particularly given Pump Fun’s significant position in the memecoin trading ecosystem.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Shopify, Coinbase Launch USDC Payments; Mastercard Expands Crypto Access

Shopify and Coinbase allow merchants to accept USDC stablecoin payments, making crypto transactions easier...

Coinbase Launches Wrapped ADA and LTC on Base, COIN Hits New High

Coinbase has introduced wrapped versions of Cardano (ADA) and Litecoin (LTC) on its Ethereum...

ClickFix Attacks Surge 517% in 2025, Fake CAPTCHAs Spread Malware

ClickFix attacks using fake CAPTCHA verifications have risen by 517% in early 2025, according...

FHFA Orders Fannie, Freddie to Consider Crypto as Mortgage Collateral

The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to consider...

Retail Investors Can Now Buy Tokenized Shares of SpaceX via Blockchain

Retail investors can now buy blockchain-based fractional shares in SpaceX through Republic. These digital tokens...

Must Read

How to Buy Dedicated Hosting With Crypto

In this article I am going to show you how to buy dedicated hosting with crypto from one of the best European hosting providers...