Coinbase, BiT Global Settle Lawsuit Over wBTC Delisting Dispute

Coinbase and BiT Global Settle Legal Dispute Over wBTC Delisting, Agree to Cover Their Own Legal Fees

  • Coinbase and BiT Global ended their legal dispute over the wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC) token delisting.
  • BiT Global agreed to dismiss its lawsuit against Coinbase permanently, and both sides will pay their own legal fees.
  • The lawsuit followed Coinbase’s removal of wBTC due to concerns about the token’s potential links to investor Justin Sun.
  • BiT Global claimed the delisting harmed wBTC’s liquidity and reputation while favoring Coinbase’s own cbBTC token.
  • The dismissal filing did not explain further terms beyond the cost arrangement.

Coinbase and BiT Global have reached a legal settlement, bringing an end to their dispute over the delisting of the wrapped bitcoin (wBTC) token from the Coinbase platform. According to a recent joint court filing, BiT Global will dismiss its lawsuit against the crypto exchange with prejudice, preventing the case from being refiled in the future.

- Advertisement -

The agreement stipulates that both companies are responsible for covering their own legal expenses. The legal conflict began when Coinbase announced it would remove wBTC due to what it described as an “unacceptable risk” that the token might be transferred to investor Justin Sun.

The filing stated that the risk surfaced after Sun, a crypto entrepreneur, became involved with wBTC through a partnership in August last year. Coinbase subsequently queried BiT Global about Sun’s role with the token. Sun has publicly supported wBTC, and World Liberty Financial later switched its cbBTC token to wBTC after Sun became its advisor.

BiT Global argued in its lawsuit that the removal was not justified and led to reduced liquidity and damage to wBTC’s reputation. The company also claimed Coinbase gave preference to its own competing product, cbBTC, which debuted two months before the wBTC delisting announcement.

No other settlement terms have been disclosed beyond the agreement on legal costs. In the court documents, there are no admissions of liability or additional information on the dispute’s resolution.

- Advertisement -

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Trump Raises Global Tariffs to 15% After Court Loss

President Trump raised a proposed global tariff from 10% to 15%, effective immediately, following...

Ethereum’s FOCIL Aims to Force Censorship-Resistant Transactions

The FOCIL proposal is the headlining feature of Ethereum's upcoming Hegota upgrade, scheduled for...

Trump’s New Tariffs Draw Bipartisan Criticism as ‘Tax’

President Trump announced a new 10% global tariff in response to the Supreme Court...

XRP, SOL ETF Inflows Defy Bitcoin, Ethereum Outflows

Spot ETFs for XRP and Solana (SOL) recorded net inflows of $4.05 million and...

AI AdGazer Predicts Which Ads You’ll Actually Watch

Researchers have created AdGazer, an AI model trained on eye-tracking data to predict human...

Must Read

Top 5 Best Crypto Faucets To Earn Free Crypto This Year

QUICK LINKSWhat Are Crypto Faucets and How Do They Work?How Do Crypto Faucets Make Money?What to Expect: Realistic EarningsThe Best Crypto Faucets of 2025:...
🔥 #AD Get 20% OFF any new 12 month hosting plan from Hostinger. Click here!