Loading cryptocurrency prices...

ChatGPT Leads Losses in Alpha Arena Crypto Trading Contest

Alpha Arena Crypto Trading Contest: Most LLMs End in Losses, Only DeepSeek and QWEN3 MAX Profit Despite Trading Challenges

  • Six large language models (LLMs) competed in the “Alpha Arena” crypto trading contest, with most finishing below their starting capital.
  • ChatGPT lost 63% of its funds, leading the losses among competitors.
  • Only two LLMs, DeepSeek and QWEN3 MAX, ended with profits, gaining $489 and $2,232 respectively.
  • Trading costs significantly affected profits due to frequent trades and small gains.
  • The competition setup imposed strict limits on models’ trading options and data access, making the task challenging.

Six large language models, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT, competed in the “Alpha Arena” crypto trading event created by Nof1. The contest, which ran for just over two weeks, involved all models trading cryptocurrencies under uniform prompts and conditions. The competition concluded on November 4th.

- Advertisement -

The final results showed that four of the six models ended with less than the initial $10,000 they started with. ChatGPT lost $6,267, equivalent to 63% of its funds. Google’s Gemini lost $5,671, X’s Grok lost $4,531, and Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet lost $3,081. Only High-Flyer’s DeepSeek and Alibaba’s QWEN3 MAX made profits, ending with gains of $489 and $2,232, respectively.

The number of trades varied widely among the models. Gemini executed 238 trades, while Claude Sonnet made only 38. Despite the difference in trade volume, all models had a win rate of 25 to 30 percent. Trading fees also impacted overall performance, with QWEN3 MAX paying the highest fees at $1,654 and Gemini paying $1,331 in transaction costs.

Nof1 highlighted that early losses were largely due to trading expenses. “PnL (profit and loss) was dominated by trading costs in early runs as agents over-traded and took quick, tiny gains that fees erased,” the organizer noted. On October 27th, some models briefly doubled their funds, and Claude and Grok managed short-term profits, while ChatGPT and Gemini remained mostly in the red throughout.

The contest was designed to be challenging, with LLMs receiving limited numerical time series data and restricted options for trading assets and actions. Nof1’s Jay Azhang commented that the models showed consistent behavior patterns, describing this as an investing “personality.” He added that the limited context and strict rules added difficulty.

- Advertisement -

Nof1 indicated a future competition is planned with improved prompts and added statistical rigor. Azhang’s goal is to develop his own crypto trading AI model, aiming to build on lessons from this event.

For further details, see Nof1’s complete post.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Dromos Labs Launches Aero, Uniting Base and Optimism DEXs

Dromos Labs is launching Aero, a new unified decentralized exchange (DEX) system that integrates...

Malicious “Safery” Chrome Wallet Steals Ethereum Seed Phrases

A malicious Chrome extension named Safery: Ethereum Wallet disguises itself as a secure Ethereum...

Chinese ‘Warren Buffett’ Zhao Bingxian’s Divorce Ends After 15 Years

The 15-year divorce case between billionaire Zhao Bingxian and his wife Lu Juan has...

Bitfarms Eyes NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin GPUs Amid Earnings Miss, Stock Falls

Bitfarms reported third-quarter revenue of $69 million, missing the expected $85 million target.The company’s...

Michael Saylor Calls MSTR a “Digital Treasury”—Claim Sparks Debate

Michael Saylor described Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) as a "digital asset treasury."The company holds Bitcoin...
- Advertisement -

Must Read

6 Best VPN Providers That Accept Monero

Privacy and anonymity are probably the most important things that we should all consider in today's internet era. Although there are a lot of...