- BRICS members disagree on a common currency and have shown mixed political support.
- Technical and documentation gaps leave the pilot Unit unverified by major central banks.
- The Gold-backed Unit concept faces storage, verification, and cost challenges.
- Economic diversity across members complicates coordination and policy alignment.
- Full BRICS monetary implementation remains uncertain and may not occur before 2030.
The BRICS proposed monetary Unit faces growing obstacles that put its launch at risk. Tensions between member states, unresolved technical infrastructure, and doubts about legitimacy have surfaced after a pilot issuance and public statements in 2024–2025. These issues make coordination and a timely rollout unlikely.
Member disagreements have undercut momentum. Vladimir Putin reportedly reversed earlier support in November 2024 by saying Russia was not seeking to abandon the dollar. Dmitry Peskov added that "More and more countries are switching to the use of national currencies in their trade and foreign economic activities." Country positions vary: India opposes a common currency, China has not publicly committed, and Brazil has shown limited concrete support.
Technical questions persist after a pilot launched on October 31, 2025. The pilot issued 100 Units through the International Research Institute for Advanced Systems, but project documents reportedly include spelling errors and incomplete specifications. Major BRICS central banks had not issued comprehensive confirmations of operational systems as of December 2024.
Project proponents stress the Unit’s aims but acknowledge practical hurdles. Vasily Zhabykin, co-author of the Unit’s white paper, said: "The Unit can keep all the wheels turning, unlike most of the other concepts that feature ‘dollar killers,’ etc. We do not want to harm anybody. Our goal is to improve efficiency of currently broken capital and money flows. The Unit is rather the ‘cure for centralized cancer’."
Logistics for a gold-backed scheme also strain plans. Storage for 6,000 metric tons of gold would need roughly 300 cubic meters of secure space, with annual maintenance costs estimated at about $579–$965 million. These demands and verification issues were not fully addressed in current plans.
Economic models differ widely across the bloc: China has state controls, India maintains democratic institutions with moderate restrictions, Russia faces sanctions, Brazil has currency volatility, and South Africa deals with structural unemployment. Yevgeny Biryukov noted that "For BRICS countries, gold is a tool to protect against sanction risks, a response to the unreliability of traditional partners, and a tangible asset recognised for thousands of years." Without far greater coordination, the BRICS monetary system faces severe implementation risks and uncertain timing.
✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.
Previous Articles:
- Fed’s $19.5B Repo Spike Raises Crypto Funding Stress -Alert!
- BitMine Stakes 82,560 ETH, Validator Queue Nears 1M ETH Rise
- Coinbase Exec: US Must Act on Transformative Market Bill Now
- XRP Tops $2 on ETF Inflows, Regulatory Shift Fuels Rally Now
- Analyst: Exchange Wallets Skew ‘Whale Accumulation’ Data Now
