BTC $71,807
2026 Bull Run Is Building Start trading with 5% OFF all fees
Sign Up Now
BTC $71,807
Bull Run 2026 | 5% Off Fees Open your Binance account today
Sign Up

Binance CEO in second-round court battle against VC giant Sequoia Capital

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao is taking Sequoia Capital back to court, saying an injunction the VC firm brought against him in 2017 unfairly exploited a “loophole” in Chinese law, resulting in undue damage to his reputation.

- Advertisement -

“I won, but the case was very damaging.” he wrote on Twitter.  It “was a critical time in the market and when there was huge interest in Binance from other VCs and investors.”

Sequoia Capital’s China subsidiary, SCC Venture VI, had sued Zhao in 2017, alleging that he had broken an “exclusivity” agreement by seeking equity from another firm, IDG Capital, during Binance’s A round. Sequoia obtained a three-month injunction on Binance’s fundraising ex-parte—meaning it was obtained unilaterally, without giving Binance the opportunity to defend itself or disclose its response publicly. This, Zhao asserts, caused harm during a vital period of his company’s growth.

The ex-parte injunction was later determined to be an “abuse of process” by the courts and was subsequently dismissed. Sequoia, as well as supporting its own $2.4 million legal bill, was required by the courts to foot Zhao’s own $779,043 bill.

Now Zhao is taking Sequoia Capital back to court, according to Coindesk, and is seeking an undeclared sum in damages. “Even after winning the award, I was not allowed to make the results public, while the fact I got sued was made public right away,” he wrote on Twitter. “[It’s] a loophole in the legal system. I have to counter sue to make the results public.”

- Advertisement -

Zhao believes the case reflects a wider pattern of bullying made possible by such loopholes in corporate law. “For most entrepreneurs, they will not be able to: front $779,000 to fight a lawsuit; secure additional funding for their startup given a pending lawsuit, even one that’s clearly without proper base and where the claimant will surely lose,” he explained.

“It is also a huge distraction to have a legal case while running a startup,” he added. “Many start-ups would have had no choice but to give in to the unfair terms/practices employed by the VC, a very famous VC at that.”

The first hearing will begin June 25 in Hong Kong. We have reached out to Sequoia Capital and will update with any response.



Source

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Iran Threatens $200 Oil After Blocking Key Shipping Strait

World oil supply has been severely disrupted after Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz,...

Stablecoin Regulation Hurts Banks More Than Crypto Firms

Regulatory hesitation over stablecoin rules disadvantages traditional banks, which are restricted from deploying built...

Large Bitcoin Accumulation Returns as Price Holds $71,000

Large Bitcoin wallets holding 10 to 10,000 BTC have resumed accumulation as the price...

CLARITY Act Crypto Bill Faces Critical April Deadline Amid Banking Stablecoin Dispute

The CLARITY Act faces a critical deadline, with odds of 2026 passage becoming "extremely...

Basel III Bitcoin Risk Review Could Spark Massive Liquidity

The Basel III banking rules, set for a 2026 update, currently assign Bitcoin a...

Must Read

The Best Bitcoin Casinos of 2025: An Expert’s Data-Driven Guide

Key TakeawaysA Deep Dive into the Top Bitcoin Casinos of 2025Bitcoin Casino Comparison Table1. Stake.com: Best for Variety & Integrated Sports Betting2. BC.Game: Best...