Altman Says NYT ‘Wrong Side of History’ in Copyright Battle Over ChatGPT

OpenAI chief critiques newspaper's AI stance during DealBook Summit appearance

  • Sam Altman criticizes NYT lawsuit at DealBook Summit, calling the publication’s stance misaligned with technological progress
  • OpenAI claims NYT manipulated prompts to generate specific responses supporting their copyright claims
  • Federal judge orders OpenAI to produce employee communications from X platform
  • Multiple copyright lawsuits target OpenAI, including actions from prominent authors and creators
  • Altman proposes micropayment system for content creators as potential solution

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman defended his company’s position against the New York Times lawsuit at Wednesday’s DealBook Summit, suggesting a new economic model for content creators while maintaining that the publication’s legal action represents resistance to technological advancement.

- Advertisement -

Legal Battle Intensifies

The dispute centers on OpenAI’s use of NYT content for training its Large Language Models (LLMs) – Artificial Intelligence systems that process and generate human-like text. The lawsuit, filed in December, alleges unauthorized use of NYT articles, with the publication’s attorneys stating that OpenAI specifically targeted their content during model development.

OpenAI’s response in January challenged these allegations, stating: "It seems they intentionally manipulated prompts, often including lengthy excerpts of articles, in order to get our model to regurgitate."

Broader Industry Impact

The legal challenge extends beyond the NYT case. Notable plaintiffs include:

  • George R.R. Martin
  • John Grisham
  • The Authors Guild
  • Sarah Silverman

A recent federal court decision requires OpenAI to disclose employee communications on X (formerly Twitter) related to work matters, potentially affecting ongoing copyright disputes.

Proposed Solutions

At the DealBook Summit, Altman outlined a potential resolution: "We need to find new economic models where creators can have new revenue streams." His proposal includes an opt-in system featuring micropayments for content creators when their work influences AI-generated content.

The CEO emphasized that the discussion should move beyond traditional fair use arguments: "I think the discussion on fair use or not is at the wrong level. Of course, we very much believe in: You need one of these right-to-learn approaches."

- Advertisement -

The outcome of this legal battle could set precedents for AI training data usage and creator compensation in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence sector.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

BPX Gains FCA Nod to Trade Tokenized Securities in the UK

BPX, a startup focused on trading tokenized securities, received several authorizations from the UK’s...

Shopify, Coinbase Launch USDC Payments; Mastercard Expands Crypto Access

Shopify and Coinbase allow merchants to accept USDC stablecoin payments, making crypto transactions easier...

Coinbase Launches Wrapped ADA and LTC on Base, COIN Hits New High

Coinbase has introduced wrapped versions of Cardano (ADA) and Litecoin (LTC) on its Ethereum...

ClickFix Attacks Surge 517% in 2025, Fake CAPTCHAs Spread Malware

ClickFix attacks using fake CAPTCHA verifications have risen by 517% in early 2025, according...

FHFA Orders Fannie, Freddie to Consider Crypto as Mortgage Collateral

The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to consider...

Must Read

What Are Anonymous Debit Cards And How Do They Work?

You've heard about anonymous debit cards, but what are they really? Anonymous Debit Cards are cards that let you make purchases without revealing your...