Loading cryptocurrency prices...

Bitcoin Maximalists and Ripple CTO Clash Over XRP Ledger Centralization Claims

Bitcoin and Ripple Communities Clash Over Political Influence and Centralization Concerns

  • Ripple‘s political activism through Fairshake PAC faces renewed criticism from Bitcoin supporters.
  • Dispute centers on XRP Ledger’s centralization, with focus on Unique Node Lists controlled by Ripple-affiliated entities.
  • Trademark assertions by Ripple Labs spark debate over XRP’s commodity status versus branded product classification.
  • RLUSD stablecoin maintains $73 million market cap, representing less than 0.04% of the stablecoin market.
  • Historical tensions between Bitcoin and Ripple communities intensify following recent policy developments.

The ongoing rivalry between Bitcoin maximalists and Ripple supporters has intensified following Ripple’s increased political influence through its Fairshake PAC activities and recent policy victories in Washington DC.

- Advertisement -

Centralization Debate Heats Up

Pierre Rochard, representing Riot Platforms, has challenged XRP’s decentralized status, pointing to Ripple Labs’ trademark assertions and control mechanisms. The dispute escalated when David Schwartz, Ripple’s CTO, defended the network’s decentralized nature.

Control Mechanisms and Validation

The XRP Ledger’s governance structure relies on Unique Node Lists (UNLs), which require validator approval from Ripple-affiliated entities. Rochard emphasizes that Ripple Labs maintains significant control over the network, including authority over ticker symbol retention during potential hard forks.

Stablecoin Strategy and Market Position

Ripple’s CBDC Platform and RLUSD stablecoin initiatives represent a strategic divergence from Bitcoin’s philosophy. The RLUSD stablecoin, launched in December 2024, maintains a $73 million market capitalization, occupying a minor position in the broader stablecoin market.

Initial distribution data shows that Ripple’s founders pre-mined 100 billion XRP tokens, allocating over 50% to insider groups. This concentration of ownership continues to fuel debates about the network’s centralization.

- Advertisement -

The conflict extends beyond technical disagreements, as evidenced by Chris Larsen’s funding of anti-Bitcoin mining campaigns through the Change the Code initiative, highlighting the deepening ideological divide between these cryptocurrency factions.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Apple Joins Robotics Race as TSLA Faces Rising Mag-7 Competition

Apple is expanding manufacturing in Vietnam to build tabletop robots and smart home devices. Morgan...

Trump Confirms US-China Trade War, Bitcoin Market Reacts to Tariffs

President Donald Trump has declared that the United States is currently in a trade...

Amazon to Hire 250K for Holidays Amid Layoff, $19–$23/hr Pay

Amazon plans to hire 250,000 seasonal and permanent workers across the U.S. for the...

North Korean Hackers Target npm, Spread Malware to Web3 Devs

North Korean Hackers uploaded over 300 malicious code packages to the public JavaScript library...

Walmart Stock Hits ATH After OpenAI Deal, Eyes $125 Target

Walmart stock rose 5.6% over the past week, reaching a record high. The company's partnership...
- Advertisement -

Must Read

18 Countries With No Privacy Laws According To UN (List)

Privacy laws are legal frameworks designed to protect personal data from unauthorized access, misuse, or disclosure.Lack of privacy laws can lead to misuse of...