Bitcoin Maximalists and Ripple CTO Clash Over XRP Ledger Centralization Claims

Bitcoin and Ripple Communities Clash Over Political Influence and Centralization Concerns

  • Ripple‘s political activism through Fairshake PAC faces renewed criticism from Bitcoin supporters.
  • Dispute centers on XRP Ledger’s centralization, with focus on Unique Node Lists controlled by Ripple-affiliated entities.
  • Trademark assertions by Ripple Labs spark debate over XRP’s commodity status versus branded product classification.
  • RLUSD stablecoin maintains $73 million market cap, representing less than 0.04% of the stablecoin market.
  • Historical tensions between Bitcoin and Ripple communities intensify following recent policy developments.

The ongoing rivalry between Bitcoin maximalists and Ripple supporters has intensified following Ripple’s increased political influence through its Fairshake PAC activities and recent policy victories in Washington DC.

- Advertisement -

Centralization Debate Heats Up

Pierre Rochard, representing Riot Platforms, has challenged XRP’s decentralized status, pointing to Ripple Labs’ trademark assertions and control mechanisms. The dispute escalated when David Schwartz, Ripple’s CTO, defended the network’s decentralized nature.

Control Mechanisms and Validation

The XRP Ledger’s governance structure relies on Unique Node Lists (UNLs), which require validator approval from Ripple-affiliated entities. Rochard emphasizes that Ripple Labs maintains significant control over the network, including authority over ticker symbol retention during potential hard forks.

Stablecoin Strategy and Market Position

Ripple’s CBDC Platform and RLUSD stablecoin initiatives represent a strategic divergence from Bitcoin’s philosophy. The RLUSD stablecoin, launched in December 2024, maintains a $73 million market capitalization, occupying a minor position in the broader stablecoin market.

Initial distribution data shows that Ripple’s founders pre-mined 100 billion XRP tokens, allocating over 50% to insider groups. This concentration of ownership continues to fuel debates about the network’s centralization.

The conflict extends beyond technical disagreements, as evidenced by Chris Larsen’s funding of anti-Bitcoin mining campaigns through the Change the Code initiative, highlighting the deepening ideological divide between these cryptocurrency factions.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

Iranian Hackers Launch AI-Driven Phishing Attacks on Israelis

An Iranian state-backed Hacking group targeted Israeli journalists, Cybersecurity professionals, and academics in a...

Nasdaq Integrates Canton Blockchain for 24/7 Collateral Management

Nasdaq has integrated blockchain technology from the Canton Network into its Calypso platform to...

Pepe Meme Coin Drops 4.7% as Investor Interest Fades Further

Pepe meme coin dropped 4.7% in value over the past 24 hours, trading at...

WhatsApp Rolls Out AI Message Summaries with Advanced Privacy

WhatsApp introduces an AI-driven feature to summarize unread messages for users. The feature, called Message...

Opyl Turns to Bitcoin Treasury as Cash Crisis Deepens

Opyl Limited, an Australian biotech company, bought around 2 Bitcoin as part of a...

Must Read

9 Best Books On Ethereum And Blockchain Technology (Beginners And Advanced Readers)

Ethereum is a complex topic, and it can be difficult to know where to start learning about it.Even for people who are familiar with...