Bitcoin Maximalists and Ripple CTO Clash Over XRP Ledger Centralization Claims

Bitcoin and Ripple Communities Clash Over Political Influence and Centralization Concerns

  • Ripple‘s political activism through Fairshake PAC faces renewed criticism from Bitcoin supporters.
  • Dispute centers on XRP Ledger’s centralization, with focus on Unique Node Lists controlled by Ripple-affiliated entities.
  • Trademark assertions by Ripple Labs spark debate over XRP’s commodity status versus branded product classification.
  • RLUSD stablecoin maintains $73 million market cap, representing less than 0.04% of the stablecoin market.
  • Historical tensions between Bitcoin and Ripple communities intensify following recent policy developments.

The ongoing rivalry between Bitcoin maximalists and Ripple supporters has intensified following Ripple’s increased political influence through its Fairshake PAC activities and recent policy victories in Washington DC.

- Advertisement -

Centralization Debate Heats Up

Pierre Rochard, representing Riot Platforms, has challenged XRP’s decentralized status, pointing to Ripple Labs’ trademark assertions and control mechanisms. The dispute escalated when David Schwartz, Ripple’s CTO, defended the network’s decentralized nature.

Control Mechanisms and Validation

The XRP Ledger’s governance structure relies on Unique Node Lists (UNLs), which require validator approval from Ripple-affiliated entities. Rochard emphasizes that Ripple Labs maintains significant control over the network, including authority over ticker symbol retention during potential hard forks.

Stablecoin Strategy and Market Position

Ripple’s CBDC Platform and RLUSD stablecoin initiatives represent a strategic divergence from Bitcoin’s philosophy. The RLUSD stablecoin, launched in December 2024, maintains a $73 million market capitalization, occupying a minor position in the broader stablecoin market.

Initial distribution data shows that Ripple’s founders pre-mined 100 billion XRP tokens, allocating over 50% to insider groups. This concentration of ownership continues to fuel debates about the network’s centralization.

- Advertisement -

The conflict extends beyond technical disagreements, as evidenced by Chris Larsen’s funding of anti-Bitcoin mining campaigns through the Change the Code initiative, highlighting the deepening ideological divide between these cryptocurrency factions.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -

Latest News

BRICS Russia Startups Gain Access to Chinese Investment at Summit

More than 600 investors will attend the upcoming BRICS startup summit in Moscow on...

UAE’s M2 Capital Invests $20M in Ethena’s ENA Token Expansion

M2 Capital Limited, part of UAE-based M2 Holdings, invested $20 million in Ethena’s ENA...

Ethereum Whales Accumulate $862M: Is a Major Price Surge Ahead?

Large Ethereum holders, known as whales, purchased $862 million in ETH within six hours. Ten...

Ohio Approves Crypto Payments for State Fees, Eyes Bitcoin Reserve

Ohio will allow cryptocurrency payments for state fees and services following a unanimous board...

Gate Launches Ethereum-Compatible Layer 2, Revamps GT Token

Gate has introduced Gate Layer, a new Layer 2 blockchain to raise transaction speeds...
- Advertisement -

Must Read

How to Buy VPN With Bitcoin Using CyberGhost VPN

In this step-by-step guide, you will learn how to purchase a VPN (Virtual Private Network) subscription using Bitcoin, a popular cryptocurrency, and CyberGhost VPN,...