BTC $71,807
2026 Bull Run Is Building Start trading with 5% OFF all fees
Sign Up Now
BTC $71,807
Bull Run 2026 | 5% Off Fees Open your Binance account today
Sign Up

BCBS: Non-Maturity Deposit Drivers Remain Traditional

Traditional deposit risks, not technology, drove 2023 bank runs, according to major international review.

  • A major Bank for International Settlements review finds traditional factors like deposit insurance and bank solvency still dominate deposit stability, not just withdrawal speed.
  • The 2023 bank runs were characterized by extreme concentrations of uninsured deposits, often over 90%, from specific business sectors.
  • Technology amplified the crises through faster information spread and depositor coordination rather than the mechanics of fund movement.
  • While instructive, the analysis does not address the future impact of stablecoins or tokenized money market funds on bank deposits.

A new Basel Committee working paper provides a crucial reassessment of what drives bank deposit stability following the 2023 turmoil. The international review concludes traditional risk factors, not new technology, remain the primary drivers of depositor behavior. However, it acknowledges that digital tools accelerated the runs by enabling faster information and coordination.

- Advertisement -

Consequently, the failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank shared four notable characteristics. These included extreme concentrations of uninsured deposits, with SVB at 94% and Signature at 90%, alongside sector concentration and large unrealized losses. Meanwhile, Silvergate Bank is often incorrectly grouped with these regulatory seizures.

The paper clarifies Silvergate undertook a voluntary wind down after the collapse of FTX. This critical distinction matters for drawing accurate lessons from the period. The authors note large corporations have moved funds electronically at speed since the late 1970s.

Therefore, the argument about withdrawal speed is less compelling than it initially appears. For digital asset firms and their banks, the findings are instructive on historical dynamics. Yet the paper’s scope does not cover stablecoins or tokenized money market funds. Consequently, their longer-term impact on traditional deposits remains an open question for future analysis.

✅ Follow BITNEWSBOT on Telegram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X.com, and Google News for instant updates.

- Advertisement -

Previous Articles:

- Advertisement -
Ad
Altseason Is Loading. Don't watch from the sidelines.
SOL $90.51
DOGE $0.0963
LINK $9.02
SUI $1.00
5% off fees when you sign up
Start Trading
Ad
Pay Less on Every Trade. For Life.
$10K/mo volume Save $60/yr
$50K/mo volume Save $300/yr
$100K/mo volume Save $600/yr
5% off all trading fees when you sign up
Claim Your Discount

Latest News

Bitcoin QuantumSafe Plan Costly, No Fork Needed

A researcher has proposed a quantum-safe Bitcoin transaction scheme that works without changing the...

TD Cowen Downgrades MSTR Target, Calls Sharplink a ‘Buy’

TD Cowen has initiated coverage of Ethereum treasury firm Sharplink with a "buy" rating,...

McLaren Racing Joins Hedera Governing Council

McLaren Racing has joined the Hedera Council, gaining a governance role and launching digital...

Comic raised $50K for Gaza via staged memecoin rug pulls.

Comedian William Banks orchestrated a fabricated prison break video that garnered over 10 million...

TON Blockchain Cuts Block Times, Boosts Speed 6-Fold

The Open Network (TON) released its Catchain 2.0 consensus upgrade on Thursday, slashing block...

Must Read

7 Best Crypto To Invest In This Year

Investing in cryptocurrencies has become a popular way for people to diversify their investment portfolio and make potential profits.However, with so many cryptocurrencies available...
Ad
Altseason Is Loading. These 4 coins are trending right now.
SOL $92.12
DOGE $0.0950
LINK $9.02
SUI $1.02
5% off spot fees when you sign up
Start Trading